Interpretation - Amid rapid growth in artificial intelligence business, why does Meta want to issue a class of non-voting shares?

Anzar Mehraj/Prathik Jayaprakash

Reuters, Oct 23 - Meta Platforms (META.O) announced on Wednesday that it is issuing a new class of non-voting shares to support its artificial intelligence development initiatives, advance acquisitions, and reward employees, without diluting CEO Mark Zuckerberg's control.

This move mirrors the structures adopted by several other founder-led companies, most notably Alphabet, Google's parent company, GOOGL.O.

What is Meta doing?

Meta plans to issue a new publicly traded non-voting share, called Class C stock, and distribute it on a one-for-one basis for every existing Class A and Class B share held—effectively implementing a 2-for-1 stock split. The new shares are expected to begin trading in January 2027.

The company stated in a filing that the Class C shares will be used for fundraising, employee compensation, acquisitions, and other corporate purposes. Meta expects to issue additional shares from time to time.

Why now?

Meta said the investments needed to compete in the artificial intelligence space are “unprecedented.” As companies compete to build data centers, procure chips, and expand AI infrastructure, Meta expects its capital expenditures to reach $135 billion to $145 billion by 2026.

The company noted that financing on such a scale through debt could negatively impact its credit rating, making equity financing more attractive. Management hopes to issue the Class C shares as early as the end of 2026, according to the filing.

How does this help Zuckerberg?

This structure allows Meta to raise equity capital without issuing additional voting shares.

Zuckerberg controls the company through super-voting Class B shares. By issuing non-voting Class C shares, Meta can both sell shares to investors and use them for acquisitions or employee compensation, without significantly weakening his voting power.

The special committee at Meta noted that maintaining Zuckerberg’s leadership was a key objective of this capital restructuring, and added that Zuckerberg would not support large equity financings that dilute his voting control.

The committee proposed setting a “sunset clause” for the dual-class equity structure: under trigger events (such as Zuckerberg’s death, incapacity, resignation, or a dramatic reduction in his holdings), his Class B shares would convert into Class A shares.

However, Zuckerberg has said he will not support a sunset clause or any measure that could result in losing voting control.

“Meta needs massive amounts of capital to support its AI business expansion,” said Dennis Dick, Chief Market Strategist at Stock Trader Network. “We’ve seen many companies finance their AI expansion by issuing more bonds, only to see their stocks punished by investors for weakening their balance sheets,” he added, citing Oracle (ORCL.N) and CoreWeave (CRWV.O) as examples.

“This is a better way to raise money while keeping the balance sheet healthy.”

How many shares will Zuckerberg get?

Like all existing shareholders, for each Class A and Class B share he holds, he will receive one Class C share.

As of October 1, 2026, he directly holds about 341.2 million Class B shares and 1.2 million Class A shares—representing approximately 60.6% of Meta’s voting rights and a 13.4% equity stake. Therefore, he will receive approximately 342.4 million Class C shares.

Under a separate Founder Alignment Agreement, only 20% of the Class C shares obtained by the “stockholder group” (meaning Zuckerberg and certain permitted transferees) can be freely sold immediately.

The remainder will be restricted, aiming to prevent him from monetizing his holdings without a commensurate reduction in his voting influence.

Has anyone else done something similar before?

Google is the closest precedent. In April 2012, the company announced its plan for a non-voting Class C share dividend (link), which subsequently prompted a shareholder class action in Delaware. Google eventually settled and the agreement was approved by the court in October 2013.

According to the settlement, if Class C shares traded at a discount of more than 1% to Class A shares in the first year, Google agreed to compensate Class C shareholders.

The Class C share dividend was distributed on April 2, 2014. In 2015, based on the discount between Class A and Class C prices, Google determined it needed to pay $522 million in adjustments to Class C shareholders.

Why does Zuckerberg want these shares?

One motivation discussed in the filing is California’s Proposition 40, a wealth tax initiative scheduled for a public vote in November 2026. This proposition would levy a one-time tax equal to 5% of net assets on billionaires residing in California as of January 1, 2026.

The tax targets accumulated wealth, not income. Meta stated that Zuckerberg told the special committee he is considering relocating because of a potential multi-billion-dollar tax bill. The Class C structure would allow him to sell some non-voting shares without immediately reducing his voting control.

The Meta board noted that Zuckerberg’s current equity stake is already aligned with shareholders’ interests, making further cash compensation or equity awards unnecessary—an approach that has remained consistent for years.

(To make its reporting more accessible to non-native English readers, Reuters provides automated translation with several other languages. Because automated translation may contain errors or lack necessary context, Reuters does not guarantee the accuracy of the automated translation and provides it solely for reader convenience. Reuters accepts no responsibility for any damage or loss resulting from the use of the automated translation function.)