Caitlin Long, who serves as founder and CEO of Custodia Bank, has raised significant questions about the future of stablecoins as tokenized bank deposits draw increasing attention in both the financial industry and regulatory circles.
Custodia Bank CEO Caitlin Long warns tokenized deposits could outpace stablecoins
Stablecoins versus traditional banking deposits
Long noted that the current stablecoin market is valued around $300 billion, a figure considerably smaller than the $5.7 trillion held in conventional demand deposits within the banking sector. She argued that while stablecoins have established themselves in the digital asset landscape, the introduction of tokenized deposits into mainstream banking could signal a much broader transformation.
Tokenized deposits refer to digital representations of funds that are issued and guaranteed by regulated banks, as opposed to stablecoins, which are typically anchored to fiat or other assets but are not always managed within the traditional banking framework.
Mini dictionary: Tokenized bank deposits, also called tokenized deposits, are digital tokens that represent claimable funds held at regulated banks. These tokens can be transferred and settled on blockchain networks, offering real-time transaction speeds and enhanced transparency, while being backed by traditional deposits in the banking system.
Long stated that the push to integrate tokenized dollars into the existing financial system could “crowd out” stablecoins by leveraging the vast deposit base banks already manage. She emphasized that this integration might become an even larger story than the rise of stablecoins themselves.
Custodia Bank is a digital asset-focused financial institution headquartered in Wyoming, known for advocating regulatory clarity for cryptocurrencies while offering specialized services to institutional clients.
Regulatory momentum and official perspectives
Long explained that US Treasury officials support tokenized dollars as a means to maintain oversight and control over digital money. According to her, the Federal Reserve has approached the tokenization trend with caution, reflecting concerns about potential risks and implications for the broader monetary system.
Long described the situation as follows: “Stablecoins are at about $300 billion, but when you think about the $5.7 trillion in regular demand deposits, the movement to tokenize those funds could become the bigger development. The challenge is whether stablecoins will fade in importance if deposit tokenization becomes widespread.”
She further outlined the regulatory environment, pointing to new policy actions such as the GENIUS Act rules, which are designed to address the usage and transparency of digital assets in the banking sector. Long observed that authorities hope tokenized deposits will provide the benefits of blockchain efficiency while keeping digital finance within established regulatory boundaries.
Community banks and larger institutions reportedly hold differing views on the migration of deposits, with debates ongoing regarding deposit flight and competitive pressure on smaller banks.
The macro implications for digital assets
Touching on macroeconomic issues, Long identified the desire for tokenized dollars as a Treasury strategy to strengthen oversight and manage demand for US government debt. The Federal Reserve’s approach was described as deliberately slow-moving, with officials evaluating the longer-term consequences of new deposit models and their effect on financial stability.
Long also commented on the “digital gold” narrative surrounding Bitcoin, suggesting that retail investors and institutional players are increasingly holding Bitcoin as a long-term store of value despite market uncertainties.
| Stablecoins | $300 billion | Private crypto companies |
| Traditional demand deposits | $5.7 trillion | Regulated commercial banks |
| Tokenized bank deposits | Emerging | Regulated commercial banks |
Volatility in treasury markets, changing monetary policy, and advances in artificial intelligence are also pressuring the existing banking model, according to Long. She drew parallels to historical episodes, such as past Federal Reserve policy shifts, to highlight potential risks as the financial system evolves.
Discussions continue across regulatory and industry circles about how best to balance innovation in digital assets, safeguard financial stability, and clarify rules for new forms of digital money.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports
Money market fund inflows plummet to 158 billion—Is short-term US Treasury liquidity flashing a warning sign?
Money market fund inflows have sharply dropped to $158 billion in the first three quarters of this year, driving Treasury yields higher. Increased volatility at the short end has raised market concerns about tightening short-term financing.
TAO crypto price consolidates – Why $318 is Bittensor’s next big test
Tokenization Becomes a Key Focus for the U.K. Financial Sector

