MAPO fluctuated by 109.4% in 24 hours: ButterNetwork cross-chain bridge vulnerability led to massive token minting
Bitget Pulse2026/05/21 16:02Volatility Summary
In the past 24 hours, the price of MAPO has experienced dramatic fluctuations, currently quoted at $0.002110. The 24-hour high reached $0.003070, while the low dropped to $0.001466, resulting in a volatility amplitude of 109.4%. During this period, the price first surged rapidly and then sharply retraced, reflecting the market's extreme reaction to unexpected events. Public market data shows that trading volume significantly increased during the event; however, authoritative on-chain aggregation platforms have not yet released real-time data on the specific 24-hour turnover and capital net flow.
Brief Analysis of the Cause of the Abnormal Movement
This abnormal movement directly stems from a security incident that broke out within the past 24 hours:
- A Solidity contract vulnerability in Butter Network’s cross-chain bridge (V3.1) allowed attackers to successfully mint about one trillion MAPO tokens via the bridge, far exceeding the project’s legitimate circulating supply and resulting in a rewrite of the tokenomics.
- Security firms such as PeckShield issued warnings approximately 20 hours after the incident, confirming that the massive minting may have resulted from a smart contract vulnerability or privilege abuse.
- The MAP Protocol official team immediately suspended the cross-chain bridge between MAPO ERC-20 and the mainnet to prevent further losses and launch an investigation.
All of the above incidents occurred within the past 24 hours, and constitute the only verifiable direct driver for the dramatic price volatility, with no other mainstream news or capital activity corroborated.
Market Sentiment and Outlook
The prevailing sentiment among the community and analysts is extremely pessimistic. The incident is widely portrayed by the X platform and crypto media as a “bridging security collapse” case, raising concerns over major damage to project trust. Some opinions suggest that if the minted tokens enter circulation, it will further dilute the value of existing holdings; in the short term, prices may continue to face pressure, and attention should be focused on official investigation results and progress on bridge recovery. Regarding risk warnings, multiple media outlets emphasize that cross-chain bridges remain a prime target for hackers and recommend users closely monitor official announcements to avoid blindly buying the dip.
Note: This analysis is automatically generated by AI based on public data and on-chain monitoring, and is for informational purposes only.Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Uniswap processes $70.6 billion in 30-day DEX trades, outpacing rivals
Morgan Stanley’s $50.6M BTC buying shields market – But rally to $82K has THIS hurdle

Will the Fed "continue raising interest rates"? Will the "tightening cycle" of the late 1980s be repeated?
The Citi report points out that the current macro environment is highly similar to the tightening cycle of 1988-1989, when the economy remained resilient and inflation pressures gradually accumulated, followed by a slowdown in economic activity before policies shifted to easing. During that tightening cycle, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates 16 times in a row.
Rare alliance of arch-rivals! Musk and Altman support Dario Amodei's call to "slow down AI globally"
Anthropic's Amodei issued a call to "slow down AI globally," and to everyone's surprise, rivals Musk and Altman both publicly endorsed the initiative. The three industry giants unanimously agreed to grant third-party access to "employee-level" evaluation rights and to implement coordinated deceleration measures. Altman went further, announcing that OpenAI will not IPO this year. The resignation of a researcher and a collective breakout of uncontrollable AI systems have ignited long-standing industry fears.